AI-MSL Savings Estimator

What could a governed AI-SDLC save your team?

Enter your current monthly software cost breakdown. See what the same workload would cost under AI-MSL, with at least 3x delivery speed. No calendar booking, no email gate until you want the detailed report.

Four sliders, two pickers · Under 60 seconds
Savings · live model
A What type of software do you maintain? (select all that apply)
01 Software maintenance · monthly ? Corrective maintenance (bug fixes), adaptive maintenance (framework / API updates), dependency upgrades, security patches, QA, and small enhancement work.
$25K
$5K $100K
02 Production support · DevOps / SRE / CI-CD ? Incident response, on-call rotation, observability, pipeline maintenance, release engineering, and platform reliability work.
$15K
$5K $100K
03 Cloud / on-prem infrastructure · monthly ? Hosting, compute, storage, networking, and managed-service spend across cloud and on-prem environments.
$40K
$3K $1M
04 New development · PM / Dev / QA · monthly ? Feature work, new product initiatives, and the PM / dev / QA capacity required to deliver them.
$200K
$20K $1M
B Current engineering delivery model (select all that apply)
Total monthly cost
$280K
Trusted by engineering teams at
Success stories from AI-MSL

Production proof, not projections.

Verified outcomes from active customer engagements. The calculator estimates. These engagements delivered.

The problem

Software evolution still scales with hiring. That's the bottleneck.

AI tools shave hours off coding, but unmanaged acceleration creates new failure modes faster than it removes the old ones. Three patterns we see almost everywhere.

01

Velocity capped by headcount

Every new feature costs a new hire, a new manager, and another round of onboarding. The roadmap moves at the speed of your hiring pipeline, not your product.

02

AI without governance creates drift

Generated code lands faster than it can be reviewed, documented, or aligned to the architecture. Quality erosion is silent until production catches it.

03

Delivery is unpredictable

Sprint cycles depend on capacity, not process. Every quarter is a negotiation between roadmap intent and what the team can ship.

How it works

A structured AI lifecycle, not a developer-augmentation hack.

Three governed phases. AI assists at every stage. Execution is bounded by expert review, traceability gates, and lifecycle accountability.

01

Specify

Requirements, architecture, and acceptance criteria are documented before code generation. Nothing ambiguous propagates into the implementation.

02

Generate, governed

AI executes inside structured gates with expert review at each transition. Speed scales, but discipline scales with it.

03

Observe and improve

Every change is auditable, every decision is documented, every regression is surfaced before it reaches users.

What you get

Outcome-priced delivery. Auditable. Defensible on every call.

Four outcomes a governed AI-Managed Software Lifecycle engagement is designed to produce. The calculator above gives you a directional range for your team. The full report tells you what an engagement at your size and stage typically looks like.

01

Reduced developer-dependency risk

Software evolution stops being throttled by hiring cycles. The lifecycle, not headcount, sets the cadence.

02

Predictable delivery

Outcome-priced engagements with timelines you can defend in front of a board. Roadmap meets reality on schedule.

03

Lower total cost of change

Typical directional impact: 30 to 70 percent reduction in the lifecycle cost of maintaining and extending revenue-critical systems.

04

Governed AI adoption

Speed without architectural drift, security blind spots, or fragmented system knowledge. Discipline scales with output.

Run the numbers for your team. Then we'll talk.

The calculator gives you a defensible range in 30 seconds. The full report walks through the math on your inputs and what a v1 engagement at your size and stage typically looks like.